And blame the Jew is
The evening bus trip has inspired me to a fresh record. Rather, to an episode from my life. Episode is perhaps said more than is necessary to content, but shit forty-five minutes of history-credit course may be all, if you're surrounded with people who are stupid. More specifically, one can not really describe the. Stupid.
What exactly do you take advanced courses in the history of a third school term by the individual? You might think is asking for his world view to expand a little, especially when there must be even on Saturdays and school where you learn as a motto international has. The truth about is Prussia, and for an explanation. And when the one who writes the curriculum, notes that Thomas Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau no Prussia are in the immediate sense (actually less in the other), then you will still get away briefly from Prussia. But even if the teacher is a very courageous one. Of course, a good old 68s - and I think almost all history teacher that I ever meet allowed, are Alt-68s - to beat at this point not in a position, sometimes not bow to modernity. It is, after all, the job of good old 68s, the students on certain or uncertain relationships noted. It is determined quickly that the above three reconnaissance very, very important and which has even helped out, fundamental rights and formulate that kind of stuff and that's really important Undso. That said, five minutes have passed and it is finally time to turn to but now the real important things. What is more important than Hobbes? Perhaps Descartes? No way, it comes naturally to the Commons Americans. For a history interested Alt-68s and the history interested future or failure of high school graduates interested in nothing more than the congregation as the stupid Americans and sow now needs to accept that the Moslem women despite its democracy like further suppressed.
While I am already collapsed internally in the future insults to me is an article from the time occurred, who has studied a while ago with the conditions in Iran. I do not understand too much of text analysis, I must admit, I do not even know what an aphorism, and whether anything has to do with the article at the time, but the substantive message of the article was something like this:
The Iranian Parliament has recently passed a bill accordingly before brittle Women from now on no more from the age of nine, no, but may be executed only after ten years. What makes all but Nocht great, that these are not stoned, but is only suspended. And that's really been progressive or?
back So, the Americans must understand that the Muslim would like to take some of his habits in the new democracy. Islamic Morals refers in the case on the issue raised by Mr Al-Jaafari Sharia.
Yes, yes it was not all that great, but democracy was still a long, ongoing process and we must understand and should not narrow-minded view of the world put Bush on the day. That statement reminded me of the above-mentioned articles of the time. Anyway, it's absolutely nothing bad to most Islamic customs, such as could not take the headscarf in Iran, which determined the Mussulman in a functioning democracy.
Since then I was very stupid happened. I noticed that it would be a strange democracy, in which the women have to be suppressed further. The first objection came promptly by a Persian classmates and was something like: "What does it matter to you because what we do with our women?"
course I was immediately convinced, wanted to admit my mistake in a very open-minded girl from behind me, transportation, and what I then of oppression in Iran knew where I was as yet neither, nor have ever read the Koran. True. Nor was I ever in Kazakhstan, but I think he is right where the map describes him o__o
Well, the Old 68s had to be again - a bit quiet - have your say and tell me in due form to , but please indicate that I do not have such anti-democratic tendencies in the Arab states, with something innocuous, such as the headscarf should bring the name.
I remembered then frankly nothing more a better than to ask again, what exactly happens to women in Iran who make their extensive use rights and not their head scarves in public for an afternoon . Who Somehow the topic of the question over and it was devoted to the problem of whether democracies really caused by armed conflicts, says as the madman in the West yet, or whether they arise through peaceful processes, such as Gandhi taught us. I was been there so not sure, and fortunately there is another classmate, otherwise I would feel funny, the rest was, however, agreed. Peaceful democracies arise through non-violent resistance. If you ask then how the people are in North Korea do that, there's a favorite answer: "If democracy, then you do something for the money!"
Going to do so, so, we want to know how exactly do the this, but where from the 19 would be millions of citizens of this state, 1.1 million paid well, soldiers loyal to the government, while a third of the 19 million without a permanent, international aid starve, something interesting happened. "However, if want democracy, they also do something for it! " Before you can go further on it comes because then: "John, call me, will you three countries, which was successfully installed a democracy after a war." "Okeh, Germany, Japan, France, maybe even more?", "Du neh, last."
...
John: "You know, if they'd done at that time the Korean War with all its consequences, we might just not us talk about North Korea have to, because there would have been after the resignation Syngman Rhee end of the 50 might be a democracy for the entire peninsula
answer. "Is ne interesting theory"
John: "Why Theory
answer:" Who or what is Syngman Rhee? "
That the no back mixing of Bahlsen, I have at the moment unfortunately not mentioned-.-
runs this way is then in the sand and the hour is fortunately one day over and a new, somewhat more boring in my life is mastered and used the Livejournal for the first time as a diary.
In the break I've learned too, that must be understood so that Mussulman in the air blow up and build nuclear bombs do, where to throw the Jews but all that and get into all that is Arab (...?).
Because you realize then careful that Haffiz al-Assad, his character responds to foreign ministers of Syria, called in 1967 in all public and in accordance with the head of the government to destroy all Jews and goes: "But anyway, and also put the Jews. indeed anywhere in America with it and wanting it all so Undso only as a colony. "
I've then bought a Cornetto. Cornetto is not an Italian mafia or human rights, but an ice Langnese - currently.
Well, that is with the Zionist conspiracy, of which a schonmal talk I think. Quite nice, as these views hike so the various political spectra. Therefore, Cooper in the subject.
~ ~
0 comments:
Post a Comment