lawyer calls replay
as already noticed some, a French lawyer tried to repeat the World Cup finals from 2006 could. The reason is quite simple: He believes that the 4th Official has not seen the foul, but it has only seen the TV pictures and has subsequently informed the referee has seen. That would be to Fifa statutes not allowed.
http://focus.msn.de/sport/wm2006/videobeweis_nid_31898.html?DDI=3305
I find interesting is all right and would hope that there are times when individual process. Not because I would want to see the finals again, but because I want to know how the judges would decide. After all, the World Cup final was special and also in spirit by not reconstruct.
I also firmly believe that FIFA can come up as something to prove the innocence of the fourth official. This of course would only happen if he really has taken the television pictures to help.
So, we let ourselves be surprised how the whole time runs out. I'm guessing that nothing will happen, and Italy will continue to be world champion.
But the topic "video evidence" is of course taken up again. As in American football already standard practice is, is also being discussed for years for football. I personally consider them very little. The only way that I think would be useful would be the one that was supposedly practiced in the final. Once this "pack", forms may the 4th Crouch happy man at the screen to judge. Anything else would be a waste of time and IMO would make the game flow broken.
0 comments:
Post a Comment